• Home
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to Daily Newsletter
  • NextGenInfra.io
No Result
View All Result
Converge Digest
Friday, April 17, 2026
  • Home
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to Daily Newsletter
  • NextGenInfra.io
No Result
View All Result
Converge Digest
No Result
View All Result

Home » FCC Ends Cable Exclusivity for Consumers Residing in Multiple Dwelling Units

FCC Ends Cable Exclusivity for Consumers Residing in Multiple Dwelling Units

October 30, 2007
in Uncategorized
A A

The FCC will ban the use of exclusivity clauses for the provision of video services to multiple dwelling units (MDUs) or other real estate developments. Nearly 30% of Americans live in MDUs and these numbers are growing. From 1995 to 2005, cable rates have risen 93%. In 1995, cable service cost $22.37 per month. Prices for expanded basic cable service have now almost doubled. The trend in pricing of cable services is of particular importance to consumers. Since 1996 the prices of every other communications service (such as long distance and wireless calling) have declined while cable rates have risen year after year after year.

The FCC said it is seeking to foster greater competition in the market for the delivery of multichannel video programming. These rules will increase choice and competition for consumers residing in MDUs and other real estate developments.

Specifically the Order finds that:

  • exclusivity clauses that bar competitive entry harm competition and broadband deployment and can insulate the incumbent MVPD from any need to improve its service.
  • exclusivity clauses are widespread in agreements between MVPDs and MDU owners.
  • incumbent cable operators have increased the use of exclusivity clauses in their agreements with MDU owners with the entry of LECs into the video marketplace.
  • the use of exclusivity clauses in contracts for the provision of video services to MDUs constitutes an unfair method of competition or an unfair act or practice under Section 628(b).

The Commission also adopted a Further Notice of the Proposed Rulemaking (Further Notice) that seeks comment on whether we should take action to address exclusivity clauses entered into by DBS providers, private cable operators, and other MVPDs who are not subject to Section 628. The Further Notice also seeks comment on whether the Commission should prohibit exclusive marketing and bulk billing arrangements.

In a statement, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said “All consumers, regardless of where they live, should enjoy the benefits competition in the video marketplace. Exclusive contracts between incumbent cable operators and owners of “multiple dwelling units” (MDUs) have been a significant barrier to competition. Today’s order removes this barrier. Specifically, the item we adopt today finds that the use of exclusivity clauses in contracts for the provision of video services to MDUs constitutes an unfair method of competition or an unfair act or practice in violation of Section 628(b) of the Act. Thus, we prohibit the enforcement of existing exclusivity clauses and the execution of new ones by cable operators.”http://www.fcc.gov

Tags: AllLast Mile
ShareTweetShare
Previous Post

U.S. Internet Tax Ban Extended Through 2014

Next Post

Toshiba Launches Enhanced Softphone

Staff

Staff

Related Posts

Blueprint: Building wholesale networks with OTN
All

Blueprint: Building wholesale networks with OTN

December 20, 2022
Huawei and Orange achieve 157 Tbps over 120km fiber link

Huawei and Orange achieve 157 Tbps over 120km fiber link

December 20, 2022
Oracle opens cloud region in Chicago
All

Oracle opens cloud region in Chicago

December 20, 2022
BT trials C-RAN in Leeds
All

BT trials C-RAN in Leeds

December 19, 2022
BT to combine Enterprise and Global units to create BT Business

BT to combine Enterprise and Global units to create BT Business

December 19, 2022
euNetworks appoints Stephanie Lynch-Habib to President

euNetworks appoints Stephanie Lynch-Habib to President

December 19, 2022
Next Post

Pakistan's Mobilink Chooses DragonWave for WiMAX Backhaul

Please login to join discussion

Categories

  • 5G / 6G / Wi-Fi
  • AI Infrastructure
  • All
  • Automotive Networking
  • Blueprints
  • Clouds and Carriers
  • Data Centers
  • Enterprise
  • Explainer
  • Feature
  • Financials
  • Last Mile / Middle Mile
  • Legal / Regulatory
  • Optical
  • Quantum
  • Research
  • Security
  • Semiconductors
  • Space
  • Start-ups
  • Subsea
  • Sustainability
  • Video
  • Webinars

Archives

Tags

5G All AT&T Australia AWS Blueprint columns BroadbandWireless Broadcom China Ciena Cisco Data Centers Dell'Oro Ericsson FCC Financial Financials Huawei Infinera Intel Japan Juniper Last Mile Last Mille LTE Mergers and Acquisitions Mobile NFV Nokia Optical Packet Systems PacketVoice People Regulatory Satellite SDN Service Providers Silicon Silicon Valley StandardsWatch Storage TTP UK Verizon Wi-Fi
Converge Digest

A private dossier for networking and telecoms

Follow Us

  • Home
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to Daily Newsletter
  • NextGenInfra.io

© 2025 Converge Digest - A private dossier for networking and telecoms.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to Daily Newsletter
  • NextGenInfra.io

© 2025 Converge Digest - A private dossier for networking and telecoms.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version